Skip to main content

Reason 1739 that people should have a special licence to be able to drive these monster vehicles ... If anyone is unable to get out of this spot, they shouldn't have a licence ... Just saying

Hugz & xXx

RAM driver's 'passive aggressive' note to motorist parked outside home https://au.news.yahoo.com/ram-drivers-passive-aggressive-note-to-motorist-parked-outside-home-021140409.html


RAM driver's 'passive aggressive' note to motorist parked outside home

The motorist hadn't parked over the resident's driveway but returned to find a 'confusing' note on his car. Do you think it was justified?
Sophie Coghill (Yahoo News)

reshared this

in reply to Melissa BearTrix 🏳️‍⚧️

Clara Listensprechen
Clara Listensprechen
•
It's too close and obstructs the home vehicle's ability to determine safety while backing out. The offender might just as well have parked right on the drive.
in reply to Clara Listensprechen

Melissa BearTrix 🏳️‍⚧️
Melissa BearTrix 🏳️‍⚧️
• •

@claralistensprechen3rd

The car parked out the front is close to the end of the driveway but I don't think there is an issue with that I think it is just the person in the big vehicle can't drive ... As it's too big for them ... That's my perception of the situation

If you have had a look at the photo of the "offending" vehicle and the driveway where the big vehicle is, I can't see a problem with the big vehicle leaving ... If they can drive

Hugz & xXx

@Clara Listensprechen
in reply to Melissa BearTrix 🏳️‍⚧️

Clara Listensprechen
Clara Listensprechen
•
No dice, Mel. The offending vehicle also unreasonably restricts maneuvering out of the driveway. The driver of the offending vehicle is officially an asshole for spitting hairs so close besides.
in reply to Clara Listensprechen

Robert Watkins
Robert Watkins
• •

@claralistensprechen3rd Every state has traffic laws about parking too close to a driveway crossover.

SA is the only one that has codified it, though, at 1.8m either side. On that standard, this guy is far too close.

But Victoria's legislation merely states "on or across a driveway” - and by _that_ standard (which is the one that applies), the Nissan is parked perfectly legally.

@Clara Listensprechen
in reply to Robert Watkins

Melissa BearTrix 🏳️‍⚧️
Melissa BearTrix 🏳️‍⚧️
• •

@twasink @claralistensprechen3rd

Thanks ... I think in the inner west they don't care unless it's over the dive way ... Out in the suburbs I think the rules are enforced more ... Hugz

And the double drive way would make that an easy exit

Hugz & xXx

@Robert Watkins @Clara Listensprechen
in reply to Melissa BearTrix 🏳️‍⚧️

Michael ☕️
Michael ☕️
• •

No sympathy for homeowner. The car isn't blocking the driveway and the homeowner does not own the public street in front of the house. Anyone at all can legally* park there.

*in the U.S.

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Michael ☕️

Clara Listensprechen
Clara Listensprechen
•
^^^ Somebody who has too little regard for traffic safety to hold a license to drive.

reshared this

in reply to Clara Listensprechen

Melissa BearTrix 🏳️‍⚧️
Melissa BearTrix 🏳️‍⚧️
• •

@claralistensprechen3rd @mcpinson

Where that car is parked is not an offence at all ... That little hump and drive way is a no stopping, where that car is legally parked ... And the big vehicle has a double drive way

Hugz & xXx

@Michael ☕️ @Clara Listensprechen
⇧