Skip to main content


Federation with #Bluesky (via #ATprotocol) is getting closer.

The sandbox environment has now been launched, which means you can set up your own AT protocol-enabled server.

It's possible that Bluesky will finally start federating by the end of summer. However, knowing how most dev teams work, this launch is not a certainty. It always takes time to iron out bugs.

How successful do you think Bluesky's federation will be? And how will it impact the current userbase using Bluesky?

https://beyondtheblue.substack.com/p/beyond-the-blue-6
@fediversenews@venera.social

reshared this

in reply to Chris Trottier

I think the current user base will ignore it entirely. They do not care and want nothing to do with federating.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I'm just excited for a bridge to be built between AT Protocol and ActivityPub. While I've been making a bridge behind the scenes, it operates under the assumption that Bluesky won't federate at all.
in reply to Chris Trottier

From a diagram I saw the other day, it's not clear to me that AT will survive the main (aka, Bluesky itself) instance going offline. Is that correct? Although perhaps folks will prefer that, given it affords a true aggregation of likes, etc.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Their federation might work, technically, but I'm not so sure their users are open to communicate with others. After I've tested Bluesky for a while, I sense that people on that platform might appreciate being in their own little environment.

@fediversenews@venera.social

in reply to Chris Trottier

in reply to Matthieu

100% agreed. I think the recent post by developer Paul (https://bsky.app/profile/pfrazee.com/post/3jypici6ihm2m) was pretty telling, where he explained why bluesky was bothering with federation. His argument was that it was a protection against enshittification from the bluesky organisation. This is all well and good, but reading between the lines, the implication was pretty clear: the bluesky organisation is running the show, and federation is only really relevant in case it truly goes to shit. Its nothing like activitypub where the base assumption is that there are tons of different admins running servers. Theres the theoretical possibility to run a competing service on ATproto, but only if youre wellfunded and really want to take on the bluesky organisation
Unknown parent

Nullstring 🏴‍☠️
oh word does bluesky use activitypub? (this is rhetorical and sarcastic, feel free to ignore me)
in reply to Chris Trottier

@Chris Trottier Pretty sure friendica already had blusky implemented last month but that's because they are the one ring to rule them all even federated with diaspora.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

meta bad but bluesky good? hell, im gonna be the devils advocate and say that meta is doing the effort to come here

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

@Chris Trottier Food for thought because I haven't seen anyone mention this yet:

This means that #Bluesky will be able to federate with #Threads a.k.a. #Barcelona a.k.a. #P92.

Dis gon b gud. /me grabs a folding chair and a bag of popcorn.

in reply to Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)

@Tokyo Outsider (337ppm) No, it was just an idea of mine.

But I guess that Bluesky itself won't develop its own ActivityPub federation, so everything would have to be done by those projects that desire to federate with Bluesky for one reason or another.