Skip to main content


🚨NEWS: The company that chartered the ship that destroyed the Key Bridge was just sanctioned by regulators for silencing whistleblowers raising safety concerns.

Maersk’s policy violated the law, according to federal documents reviewed by The Lever. https://www.levernews.com/feds-recently-hit-cargo-giant-in-baltimore-disaster-for-silencing-whistleblowers/

in reply to David Sirota

Companies silence whistleblowers. They demote them, give them poor job ratings or jobs that make them quit, and fire them for unrelated reasons. That works well in "right to work" states, which are really right to fire at will states.

Companies don't often get caught with evidence obvious enough to draw regulators attention. Getting fined for it is a big deal. It's also a red flag that cost cutting and other intentional conduct might have contributed to a predictable tragedy.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to David Sirota

So.... Shipping's no different than US rail.

I know Biden said the Federal government is going to pay to replace the bridge, but it really seems like the shipping company ought to be on the hook for both the bridge, the lost revenues for the port of Baltimore and the salaries of the soon to be idled dock workers (etc).

Clara Listensprechen reshared this.

in reply to David Sirota

@The_Icarian

I feel like gcaptain.com is most likely to have the straight scoop.

https://gcaptain.com/breaking-mv-dali-cited-for-propulsion-issues-before-baltimore-incident/

Clara Listensprechen reshared this.

in reply to David Sirota

Huh. Seems like that’s who ought to pay for the new bridge. 🤷‍♂️